Catalog (/sci/)

ONLINE USERS TV: … Radio: … FNet: … VC: … IRC: …



Return to index
Sort by:
Omarchy (by Omacom) is "We've made the decisions for you" Linux distro, heavily AI-assisted around proprietary software, designed to run proprietary AI coding agents (unusual security risk) having access to your full system, where they execute commands usually not stop for confirmation.

>honeypot or legitimate project?

>the funding and promotion are certainly unusual $18.5 million
>Sam Altman (Co-founder and CEO of OpenAI), Mark Zuckerberg (CEO of Meta), Tobi Lütke, Patrick Collison, Michael Dell, Jeff Friedman, Leonid Dubinsky, Stav Solomon, Aaron Reisman, Amir Harel, Benjamin Katz, Benjamin Wolf, Bruno Katzjarowski, David Dashefsky, Davis Goodman, Jacob Rosenthal, Nina Dubinsky, Roman Weisman, Salomon Mole, Yam Catzenelson etc.
>heavy promotion & large scale SEO (similar how Brave has promoted w/ $30 million spent)
>Meta, Cloudflare, Anthropic, OpenAI etc.
>Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Google Antigravity, GitHub Copilot etc.
>Spotify, 1Password, proprietary/web applications, Discord, WhatsApp, other commercial services
>includes Basecamp & DHH owned 37signals & related software/services
>1.5-2.0 GB RAM usage at idle + large default installation
>passwordless sudo w/ disabled sudo password prompts
>paid AI APIs, token-subscriptions

Reported security issues:
>accepts command injection through video titles, notifications, sudo helper
>Lua injection through USB device names
>privilege escalation/path injection
>unsafe temporary-file handling
DO NOT FEAR DEAN THEY WILL GUIDE U IN NON EUCLIDEAN SPACE
I recently asked myself this question during my research, knowing that it's been a very long time since any new CWE directly related to management surfaces and these corruptions has been published. My main question concerns the taxonomic limits of memory corruption.
Have you ever wondered about the construction techniques, materials, and components selected for Military applications?

Military Technology is technology. Military Technology is widely understood to filter down into commercial use, however if you look i suspect you may find that there is just as much Civilian Technology filtering its way upwards in echelons of Military Technology. The appropriate terminology for this is Dual Use.

Universities have received funding for nearly a hundred years in the west to produce scientific research that is of interest to western Military apparatus. Many of these innovations can then be patented, and sold on the civilian market, or in the case of basic research, its insights are normally, and for the most part directly available to anyone. For example, the mathematics of anti-aircraft seeking missiles is freely available today, likely at your local public library.

My sense is that the lion's share of innovations in Military Technology lie in the hardening, ruggedization and construction techniques instead of some kind of transcendent alien technology, or some secret trove of found or developed technology hoarded by the Military. Most of the special sauce is nothing special at all. Some of it is quite unique, however.

An engineering problem is encountered and a corporation fulfilling the Military contract is incentivized to fund scientific research, sometimes basic research in order to solve it. In the Civilian sphere, you will rarely encounter a customer who required a bespoke solution at an industrial scale.

The result is an interesting admixture, especially of older specimens, of now-commodified-cheap componentry and hand assembly. There is a tremendous amount to be learned from the study of current and historic developments.

This French🇫🇷 man sources and records tear downs of many types Military Technology, from vintage AIM-9 IR Seeker heads and their Soviet counterpart, the K-13, to Military RF gear, Flight Avionics, and even an examination of a recovered Iranian Shahed One-Way Attack Drone servo and control surface. The results are truly illuminating.

What else could people learn from this rubble?
Hey all. Any of you into IEMs. I'm trying to find myself a nice new pair. My current ones are CCA CRA's they were cheap ChiFi and are alright just a bit tinny. I was looking at the Aria 2's and possible the EA1000s. If any of you have any good recommendations please let me know. Many thanks.

https://rentry.org/consoomer_guide

https://iem-eq-guide.pages.dev/
THIS IS NOW A RAY PEAT THREAD

and physical health in general
Welcome to /sci/ - your place for experiments, theories, and yes - even computers

>if science made it, then it MIGHT belong here


this board is replacing /tech/ because every site on the webring has /tech/ -
<but we… have /sci/….
Return to index
[ sci / cult / art ] [ λ / Δ ] [ psy ] [ r ] [ q ] [ all ]